If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the
FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to
register or
login before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| 3 JUN 2011 at 2:53pm |
marvingardCommander


Posts : 2826 Joined: 13 APR 2007 Location: 0
Status : Offline | Universally it is Sherman by Southerners who don't really know anything about the Civil War anyway.
Personally I would say it was indeed "Beast" Butler, or, alternatively, "Spoons Butler." He caught the headlines in the South early as a villian of a particularly foul and unchivalric disposition. Aside from the regime of looting and extortion engaged in by his New Orleans stint, he also was known by the North and South to have originated the 'contraband' concept of holding escaped slaves in a contempt of the fugitive slave act.
I can only assume, though, that Sherman, unpopular though he is with Southerners in general, is generally vindicated by history today. Aside from the 'contraband' concept, Butler was not.
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 2:56pm |
Jarhead0331Colonel


Posts : 8733 Joined: 24 MAY 2006 Location: 0, Texas
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By marvingardns
Universally it is Sherman by Southerners who don't really know anything about the Civil War anyway.
I find this comment extremely insulting. You should know better.

"And They shall know no fear, for they are fear incarnate"

|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 3:03pm |
Azzurri

Banned for 15395 days
Posts : 9755 Joined: 24 NOV 2009 Location: 0, Kentucky
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Jarhead0331
Originally Posted By marvingardns
Universally it is Sherman by Southerners who don't really know anything about the Civil War anyway.
I find this comment extremely insulting. You should know better.
I confess I am a Southerner and I do not know that much about the Civil War.
The period has never really interested me.
I am about to change that as just within the last month I bought Burns' Civil War that has been hailed by many critics and viewers as a masterpiece!
As far as Sherman, I think he went through Atlanta burning and pillaging, not that uncommon in warfare in my estimation.
Perhaps I am wrong. Feel free to correct me; I love learning.
It is better to die by a swords quick thrust than to be impaled for a lifetime upon the sharp tongue of a woman.-Grimjack
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 3:25pm |
marvingardCommander


Posts : 2826 Joined: 13 APR 2007 Location: 0
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By marvingardns
Universally it is Sherman by Southerners who don't really know anything about the Civil War anyway.
Personally I would say it was indeed "Beast" Butler, or, alternatively, "Spoons Butler." He caught the headlines in the South early as a villian of a particularly foul and unchivalric disposition. Aside from the regime of looting and extortion engaged in by his New Orleans stint, he also was known by the North and South to have originated the 'contraband' concept of holding escaped slaves in a contempt of the fugitive slave act.
I can only assume, though, that Sherman, unpopular though he is with Southerners in general, is generally vindicated by history today. Aside from the 'contraband' concept, Butler was not.
Personally as a Southerner I have a particular distaste for that most vile and perfidious Yankee foreigner Ivan Turchinoff (as it is spelled on a historical marker). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Turchaninov
His regiment raped and pillaged my hometown of Athens, Alabama.
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 3:30pm |
Azzurri

Banned for 15395 days
Posts : 9755 Joined: 24 NOV 2009 Location: 0, Kentucky
Status : Offline | Hey, you are answering your own posts.
Cool!
It is better to die by a swords quick thrust than to be impaled for a lifetime upon the sharp tongue of a woman.-Grimjack
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 3:44pm |
AshturCenturion


Posts : 413 Joined: 26 APR 2005
Status : Offline | Another name to throw into the mix with Butler and Sherman would be John Pope. Between his bombastic proclamations, and very strong "hard war" tendencies (extreme for the first part of the war in fact) he's the only General about whom Lee made it a personal issue to defeat him. I'm not gonna say he outranks the other two, but he may well be #3 on the list.
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 5:51pm |
DionCenturion


Posts : 201 Joined: 11 JAN 2005 Location: US
Status : Offline | How about President Lincoln? Wasn’t it his idea to build the Arlington Cemetery in General Lee’s front yard? I think it was an act of spite, just in case the South won the war General Lee would have to live with all those dead soldiers that died in vain. Well, I guess President Lincoln doesn’t count because he wasn’t a General. Anyway, I bet most southerners didn’t know about it at the time anyway. I think I heard about it on a documentary on the Civil War, though I'm not sure which one. A lot of people didn’t like General Grant either, both southerners and northerners, because he was so calculating, to the point that he would calculate the number of dead needed to make the south surrender. At that time the number of dead was more important than strategical locations, as the south was limited on man power, and just about everything else. Some, say he was more of an exterminator than a general. But isn’t that what a general is supposed to do if that is a feasible solution? This pissed off a lot of people, as he would attack, attack, and attack again. A lot like Sherman. In fact I think they were close friends.
[b][i]Wargaming: The art of fighting without fighting![/i][/b]
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 6:13pm |
khill9702Centurion


Posts : 999 Joined: 25 NOV 2009 Location: US, WA
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Martok
This question was spurred by a thread over in the Matrix forums (specifically, a post that was made in it several weeks back), and I've only now finally remembered to actually post my question here:
From the material I've read and seen over the years, I'd long held the belief that of the Northern generals, the South easily despised Sherman the most. Given what he did to Georgia and the Carolinas, I could certainly understand why.
However, a post in the Matrix thread claimed that it was Benjamin Butler who was actually the most loathed by Southerners, largely due to his treatment of the white civilian population of Louisiana (and the ladies of New Orleans in particular).
I'm curious as to what your guys' opinions are on this question. Also, I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the direction of books or other material out there that makes the case of Butler being the Confed's "Most Reviled".
I read somewhere that southerners started using some reference to Butler's name as an insulting euphemism for their chamber pots
|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 7:19pm |
MartokColonel


Posts : 4018 Joined: 4 JUN 2005 Location: US, Minnesota
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By marvingardns
Personally as a Southerner I have a particular distaste for that most vile and perfidious Yankee foreigner Ivan Turchinoff (as it is spelled on a historical marker). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Turchaninov
His regiment raped and pillaged my hometown of Athens, Alabama.
Interesting; I'd never heard of the fellow before. Thanks for the link, mg.
Originally Posted By Dion
How about President Lincoln? Wasn’t it his idea to build the Arlington Cemetery in General Lee’s front yard? I think it was an act of spite, just in case the South won the war General Lee would have to live with all those dead soldiers that died in vain. Well, I guess President Lincoln doesn’t count because he wasn’t a General.
Yes, I was specifically asking about generals. (I suspect Lincoln is a whole other kettle of fish.)
Originally Posted By Dion
In fact I think they were close friends.
Yeah, I believe Grant and Sherman were pretty much best buds.
"I happen to believe that both parties deserve a good scouring with a metal brush and sent to their room without reelection" - Steelgrave

|
| 3 JUN 2011 at 7:57pm |
destraexGlobal Moderator


Posts : 6188 Joined: 8 MAY 2001 Location: AT, 3D
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Jarhead0331
Originally Posted By marvingardns
Universally it is Sherman by Southerners who don't really know anything about the Civil War anyway.
I find this comment extremely insulting. You should know better.
He may have meant this with regard only to the % of southerners who don't know about the civil war. I.E. Some Southerners who have not studied the civil war in detail would think Sherman was the worst.

Medieval Real Time, Mount and Blade style Historical Combat.

|
| 6 JUN 2011 at 6:20am |
hucksterCenturion


Posts : 177 Joined: 9 JUL 2010
Status : Online | I believe the answer to that question is obviously Bob Dole.
|
| 6 JUN 2011 at 7:13am |
FenwickCenturion


Posts : 139 Joined: 29 MAR 2007
Status : Offline | Butler is the obvious answer. but the South really should have loved ineffectual generals like him because they were no danger to the Cause.
Grant was another matter. His style of war delivered the message "Go out and have that last mint julep on the veranda, y'all. This cotillion is just about over." That's a man a Confederate could resent big time.
|
| 6 NOV 2011 at 6:34pm |
KG_RangerBooBooCenturion


Posts : 33 Joined: 8 JUL 2008 Location: US
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Dion How about President Lincoln? Wasn’t it his idea to build the Arlington Cemetery in General Lee’s front yard? I think it was an act of spite, just in case the South won the war General Lee would have to live with all those dead soldiers that died in vain. Well, I guess President Lincoln doesn’t count because he wasn’t a General. Anyway, I bet most southerners didn’t know about it at the time anyway. I think I heard about it on a documentary on the Civil War, though I'm not sure which one. A lot of people didn’t like General Grant either, both southerners and northerners, because he was so calculating, to the point that he would calculate the number of dead needed to make the south surrender. At that time the number of dead was more important than strategical locations, as the south was limited on man power, and just about everything else. Some, say he was more of an exterminator than a general. But isn’t that what a general is supposed to do if that is a feasible solution? This pissed off a lot of people, as he would attack, attack, and attack again. A lot like Sherman. In fact I think they were close friends.
Actually it was Meigs who ordered that Union war dead be buried in Lee's front yard in Arlington. He had a son killed in Virginia and swore that Lee would never reclaim his house. As for most hated Union General it would probably depend on where you were at. Butler would have won that poll in New Orleans and Louisianna but Sherman would have won it in Georgia and South Carolina. If you said most hated General in the South it might have went to Braxton Bragg!
Texas - Where we have the death penalty and aren't afraid to use it!
|
| 6 NOV 2011 at 6:34pm |
KG_RangerBooBooCenturion


Posts : 33 Joined: 8 JUL 2008 Location: US
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Dion How about President Lincoln? Wasn’t it his idea to build the Arlington Cemetery in General Lee’s front yard? I think it was an act of spite, just in case the South won the war General Lee would have to live with all those dead soldiers that died in vain. Well, I guess President Lincoln doesn’t count because he wasn’t a General. Anyway, I bet most southerners didn’t know about it at the time anyway. I think I heard about it on a documentary on the Civil War, though I'm not sure which one. A lot of people didn’t like General Grant either, both southerners and northerners, because he was so calculating, to the point that he would calculate the number of dead needed to make the south surrender. At that time the number of dead was more important than strategical locations, as the south was limited on man power, and just about everything else. Some, say he was more of an exterminator than a general. But isn’t that what a general is supposed to do if that is a feasible solution? This pissed off a lot of people, as he would attack, attack, and attack again. A lot like Sherman. In fact I think they were close friends.
Actually it was Meigs who ordered that Union war dead be buried in Lee's front yard in Arlington. He had a son killed in Virginia and swore that Lee would never reclaim his house. As for most hated Union General it would probably depend on where you were at. Butler would have won that poll in New Orleans and Louisianna but Sherman would have won it in Georgia and South Carolina. If you said most hated General in the South it might have went to Braxton Bragg!
Texas - Where we have the death penalty and aren't afraid to use it!
|
| 6 NOV 2011 at 8:21pm |
John_in_VACenturion


Posts : 494 Joined: 31 MAY 2009 Location: US, VA
Status : Offline | Interesting thread!
Hard to say what opinions were 140 years ago. I'd have to agree with KG that it would probably depend on where you were, but I would confine it to when Grant initiated more or less total war during 1864. The early war behavior of Meigs, Butler, and Burnside (defining escaped slaves as "contraband") were propaganda sideshows compared to the scorched earth policies Grant employed later in the war.
If you were in the TransMississippi, probably Sherman. A good book that pretty much runs him down as pure evil incarnate from a Southern perspective is John B. Walters, Merchant of Terror: General Sherman and Total War, Bobbs-Merrill, 1973. Wikipedia has a good summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman's_March_to_the_Sea
If you were in the Eastern Theater, probably Hunter and Sheridan for "The Burning" -- laying complete waste to the Shenandoah Valley to eliminate it as a source of supplies and to put an end to the sort of Valley campaigns practiced by Jackson and Early; the latter being the closest to approach Washington during the war, actually bringing President Lincoln under fire at Fort Stevens in July 1864. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Sheridan
But behind Sherman and Sheridan was Grant's overall total war policy. He's the one who directed Hunter to "eat out Virginia clear and clean...so that crows flying over will have to carry their provender with them."
|
| 11 NOV 2011 at 12:03am |
GDS StarfuryGeneral


Posts : 16394 Joined: 26 MAY 2001 Location: 0, Starbase 10
Status : Offline | JH and Azz cant really lay claim to being Southeners as theyre both Texans.
then, as now, Texas is its own.
just sayin' 
|
| 11 NOV 2011 at 8:04am |
hrothgarCenturion


Posts : 183 Joined: 24 FEB 2010 Location: 0
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Jarhead0331 Originally Posted By marvingardns Universally it is Sherman by Southerners who don't really know anything about the Civil War anyway.
I find this comment extremely insulting. You should know better.
Assuming marvingardns knows the use of punctuation, there is no reason to take offense. If he had placed a comma after Southerners ["by Southerners, who don't really know anything..."], he would have been stating that Southerners in general know nothing. However, without the comma, he is merely speaking about that portion of Southerners who know nothing. Clearly, not everyone in the South knows anything of any significance about the Civil War.
I remember reading, several decades ago, the report from a college professor who had a conversation with a female undergrad who didn't know that the US had fought a war with Japan about forty years previously, and who asked the professor, "Who won?" If that can happen, surely many who dwell in the South--and the North--know nothing about the Civil War.
Last edited by hrothgar : 11 NOV 2011 8:07am
|
| 11 NOV 2011 at 11:14am |
SteelgraveColonel


Posts : 3319 Joined: 1 DEC 2006 Location: US
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By GDS_Starfury
JH and Azz cant really lay claim to being Southeners as theyre both Texans.
then, as now, Texas is its own.
just sayin' 
I have to agree with this. As a fellow Texan I always thought I was a southerner because we fought for the Confederacy.....but then I moved to Mississippi for 4 years. Mississippians are Southerners. Alabamans are Southerners. Georgians are Southerners. Texans are Texans.
"When in danger, or in doubt.....run in circles, scream and shout!!!", author Herman Wouk.
|
| 11 NOV 2011 at 12:12pm |
OwlHighmanCenturion


Posts : 46 Joined: 7 APR 2005
Status : Offline | George Henry Thomas was certainly hated by Southerners, in his case by his own family!
But I am a bit biased as he was in command at Nashville where my avatar was killed (Col William Shy, 20th Tennessee, a relative) when the left flank was over run. Franklin-Nashville was, in my opinion, the climax of the whole bloody war.
I also can't resist saying that Hood was out of his mind at Franklin and Nashville. You have to wonder how the end would have developed without throwing away the Army of Tennessee.
|