Stukas were to be used on the KM's CVs, Graf Zeppelin and Peter Stroesser (name speculated) had
they ever been completed. The Ju 87's would have had jetsonable landing gear in case of water landings.
EDIT:
I've often wondered what would have happened had the KM adopted the idea of building
a number of CVE's or CVL's instead of focusing (weakly) on just full size flattops. In the NA
the smaller carriers would have been more effective in large numbers in the same way that
the smaller commerce raiders with their puny guns hurt the Allies in ways that put the big
gun ships such as Bismark and the S/G BC twins to shame. In the Med a number of baby
flats could have kept a protective air cover over Rommel's supply line as well as keeping
Malta's fighters occupied with actual air superiority contenders such as the Me109T (naval
E variant) instead of just Flying Pencils and the Regina A. I understand that the KM would
never have been able to dominate either sea but a few less British capital ships here or a few
battered arctic convoys more there could have affected the Eastern Front (less Lend-lease
trucks, etc) and a few million more litres of petrol for The Desert Fox's panzers making it's
way across the RAF gauntlet might have lead to a different outcome west of Alexandria...
(Sorry to sidetrack the thread

)
<message edited by Staggerwing on Saturday, November 07, 2009 9:17 PM>