Whoa! Let me say that again, whoa! Oliver Keppelmuller’s long awaited American Civil War project (the term 'game' just doesn’t do it justice) is now due for a 21st August...
http://www.wargamer.com/articles/grand- ... ly-access/
You are thinking of a different game: War of Reconstruction. Maybe it could be a DLC with an option to actually follow the advice of General Lee and not put up statutes to the losing commanders and leaders in the first place.Will there be an option to burn the US or CSA Flags after a battle defeat? Maybe tear down statues of the Generals?
You are right one has to be careful and spell things out or they will be misinterpreted as has happened with both our responses. Mr. DMO apparently does not know the history of the statutes. Every example you give can be turned into a "whataboutism" fallacy. Sigh.Ahem. Word. May not be a thread you want to start.
Now I'm off to build my first modern NATO fleet in miniature, to include the Lutjens Class Heavy Guided Missile Destroyer D-187 BMS Feldmarschal Irwin Rommel (another loser, also ahem).
Colonel Bill
Irrelevant to my post but ok. They also defaced the monument to the 54th Mass. so what does that have to do with a game about the civil war?Thanks, Derouter666, I had NO IDEA US Grant was on the losing side!
"Protesters in San Francisco, California, toppled a statue of Ulysses S. Grant, the 18th president of the U.S. who led the Union Army during the Civil War, among other monuments at Golden Gate Park on Friday."
Charles II? I don't see why that is a problem. You must mean Charles I. Totally different because the monarchy was restored and his son Charles II became King.So, according to Standartenf??hrer Bill, Union Generals = BAD, but Rommel's okay.......got it.
Just curious, how does everyone feel about the statue of Charles II in London? Good? Bad?
Return to “Wargamer Front Page Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests